home new yorker articles
new york times articlesnewspaper articlesbook reviewsmagazine articleslinkssearchlatest articlessend me emailnew yorker articles
the evil empire strikes back

archangel
By Robert Harris
373 pp.
New York: Random House
february 14, 1999


     The cold war wasn't good for much, but it certainly was a
terrific time for thrillers: the East and West were so neatly
divided, the atmosphere so ominously noir, and everything fit
so well into a world in which the angels of democracy were destined
always to live in conflict with the alluring tug of the devil.

     In the near-decade since they took the wall away there have
been new and arguably greater threats posed by nuclear and biological
terrorism than any that Stalin could possibly have imagined.
For readers, though, it just hasn't been the same.  Nothing seems
quite so malevolent, so wholly shrouded in evil, as the Kremlin
once did.  True, Russia today is a country slipping into a different
kind of darkness, and it can be horrifying to watch.  But some
days you can hardly tell the good guys from the bad.  

     So we have to be at least a little thankful to Robert Harris,
who in his new novel, ''Archangel,'' has given those of us who
retain some literary nostalgia for the Evil Empire exactly what
we have been waiting for: a thriller about the bad old days set
in the deep, gray present.  In his previous work, most notably
his 1992 novel ''Fatherland,'' in which Hitler triumphed and
Nazism lives, Harris mapped out as his special terrain the effects
that the 20th century's great villains have had on the world;
I am sorry to report it's a subject that never seems to lose
its resonance.  

     ''Archangel'' does more than simply touch the past: its central
question -- what would happen if the great spirit of Stalin returned
to the land he practically destroyed--hovers like a storm cloud
over Russia today.  It is an issue that's easy to dismiss, and
hard to approach in a novel; but Harris goes at it with real
reporting.  Many of the little details, from the badly patterned
wallpaper in the dachas of the power elite (today no less than
in the Communist era) to the two webbed toes of Stalin's left
foot, make the place feel gruesomely right.  In Harris's able
hands you can feel the oppression of Stalin's time on every one
of Moscow's poorly lighted streets.  His contemporary portrait
of the city, overflowing with sin, possibility and hopelessness,
seems unbelievable only if you have never spent a day there.
''At five past 10, the door opened, '' Harris writes with perfect
accuracy about one of the city's nightclubs.  ''A yellow light,
the silhouettes of the girls, the steamy glow of their perfumed
breath. . . . And from the cars now came the serious money.  You
could tell the seriousness not just by the weight of the coats
and the jewelry but by the way their owners carried themselves,
straight to the head of the line, and by the amount of protection
they left hanging around at the door.  Clearly, the only guns
allowed on the premises belonged to the management.'' 

     ''Archangel'' is not without its problems, beginning with
the plot.  The story line reads like, well, a cheap thriller,
though one that moves with the speed of a freight train: Fluke
Kelso, a dissolute Soviet expert whose early academic promise
seems to have withered away with the Soviet Union itself, stumbles
on the story of the half-century while in Moscow to participate
in a conference titled, appropriately enough, ''Confronting the
Past.'' 

     While his staid academic colleagues listen pliably to the
lectures arranged by officials from the Russian national archives,
Kelso encounters a fearsome man, Papu Rapava, who was once the
bodyguard of Stalin's secret police chief, Lavrenti Beria, and
then spent the mandatory 15 years in Siberia.  Rapava, after tossing
back enough vodka to float the Potemkin, claims that Stalin left
behind an astonishing secret, to which only he has the key.  It's
a hokey literary device, but one that allows Harris to link Russia's
gloomy present to its terrifying past.  

     The harrowing -- and often outlandish -- story flows from
there.  It turns out that Russia's most evil and effective man
left behind something more of himself than even his many great
admirers had hoped, and Kelso is immediately pulled on a thrilling
journey that takes him to the edge of the Arctic, in Archangel,
a northern city that we are to interpret as the archtypical repository
of that great mythic beast, the Russian soul.  Harris's book is
most exciting as he maneuvers Kelso through the political and
criminal intricacies of Moscow, hooking him up with an audacious
and sadly credible television reporter who knows far more about
sophisticated phone equipment than he does about the country
he is covering.  Once they set off on their quest for the truth,
things get more troublesome -- for them and for the novel.  The
characters are led across the vast snows of the Russian winter
by the unknown hands of an extremist with a penchant for collecting
30's memorabilia.  Like so many of the characters in this novel,
Vladimir Mamantov would seem ludicrous if he didn't also seem
so real.  It is the ruthless Mamantov, a Stalinist dinosaur, 
who turns out to be the only man in the book
who knows what he's talking about.  

     Kelso and the television reporter, R. J. O'Brian, race to
find their quarry for strikingly different reasons: Kelso is
driven by his need to know what happened in the land to which
he has devoted his intellectual life.  He is a historian in the
rare position to see where history can take us.  O'Brian knows
a scoop when one hits him in the face.  And this is obviously
the greatest scoop he will ever have.  Naturally they find what
they are looking for -- and that's when the novel sinks beneath
the weight of its own implausibility.  The spirit of Stalin is
indeed alive in the land, but this time, predictably enough,
it emerges purely as farce.  Don't dwell on the details of the
novel too long or they will melt away like single snowflakes
striking a windowpane.  

     Harris has drawn a rude collection of characters: they are
boorish, obtuse, ignorant, vulgar and gloriously pretentious.
You could see them as foolish and fantastic, but none of them
seems particularly out of place in Moscow today: the asinine
television journalist; the sodden professor who never realized
his potential; the aging whore with a heart of gold who mistakenly
manages to get her father tortured and murdered (and who, naturally,
is saving her hard-earned dollars so that she can go to law school)
and the extremist waiting for the brass ring to come around to
his side one more time.  He is the best character of them all.

     If you pull at the threads they'll unravel; so don't.  The
book is still fun, exciting even.  That's because Harris never
loses sight of the big picture.  He understands that the Russian
people are desperate, that they long for anything that could
transport them to a better place, and that at this point, they
are willing to shoulder the most unbelievable burdens to get there.
tophome
copyright 1999, Michael Specter