home new yorker articles
new york times articlesnewspaper articlesbook reviewsmagazine articleslinkssearchlatest articlessend me emailnew yorker articles
the new york times

pristine russian far east sees its fate in gold
june 9, 1997


ESSO, Russia--The basic view from this mountain village hasn't
changed for 7,000 years, since a giant reservoir of molten lava
crested over to form the mighty peak of Asia's largest and most
active volcano.  Eagles and falcons dance through the crisp air.
Not far away, the world's biggest population of grizzly bears-- 
shaking off their winter slumber--forage for salmon as big
as dogs.  

     There is nothing else in Russia, and little left on earth,
like Kamchatka.  A peninsula the size of California, with just 
one long, partly paved road, it has more earthquakes and live 
volcanoes--including Asia's biggest and most active, Klyuchevskaya
Sopka--than anywhere else.  Thanks to its fertile rivers, lakes
and seas, the region accounts for nearly half the fish produced
in Russia.  

     But while Kamchatka, in Russia's Far East, is one of the last 
pristine places on the planet, it has been left that way by accident.  
More than 5,000 miles from Moscow, the region was protected by 
the Soviet Union because it was home to a nuclear submarine base 
in the port city of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky.  For decades it was 
off limits to all but natives, sailors and fishermen.  The staggering 
wealth that lies beneath the soil--gold, silver, platinum and more-- 
has never been touched.  

    But the temptations have never been greater, because every
year Kamchatka draws closer to death.  

     ''There is a way to save Kamchatka,'' said Aleksandr A. Orlov, 
the chief of the regional administration's department of Energy, 
Mineral Resources and Communication.  ''And everybody knows 
what it is: we have to dig for gold.  I myself want as much wild 
nature as possible.  We all do.  But first of all, people should
have a good life.  To live here we need development.  Without it
we should just turn this place into a wild park or game reserve
and move away.  Because if they stay people are going to starve.''

     The collapse of Communism, hard as it has been on many Russian
provinces, has put special pressures on Kamchatka.  Unique
in so many ways--it is, after all, so far east of Moscow that
it is almost west of Moscow--Kamchatka nonetheless presents
the most striking example of the impossible struggle remote regions
face in adapting themselves to the realities of the new Russia.

     The subsidies, incentives and discounts that Soviet leaders
doled out for living in Siberia and the distant north are gone
now and nothing that people did here in the old economy makes
sense anymore.  Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, where 300,000 of the
region's 400,000 people live and where almost no produce grows
and everything must be imported, is among the nation's most expensive
urban areas.  Bread here costs three times as much as in Moscow.
Unemployment is nearly 30 percent.  In winter an apple costs a
dollar.  

     The fishing industry in the world's largest salmon spawning
ground, which accounts for more than 80 percent of Kamchatka's
workers, is buckling under the costs of transporting its catch
back to the population centers in the west.  There is no longer
any money in hunting because it costs too much to ship meat.  Reindeer
breeding, a way of life in the north for at least a thousand years,
is also on the verge of disappearing.  The regional government
has become so impoverished it can no longer pay hunters a bounty
to kill wolves, which have multiplied rapidly and decimated the
herds.  The reindeer herders are often so desperate that they are
forced to kill their animals just to feed their families.  

An Uncertain Fate, A Difficult Choice 

     But the pressure to find a way to make Kamchatka
prosper competes with the knowledge that once digging here begins,
one more natural paradise will almost certainly be lost.  

     ''I am sure there are places on this planet as wild, beautiful
and diverse as this,'' said Yelena Dulchenko, a geologist with
the Kamchatka Institute of Ecology.  ''But I just don't
know where they could be.  If they dig for gold here they will
ruin Kamchatka forever.  It will become just another place that
used to be special.'' 

     Gold fever sometimes makes debates seem simple, and it would
be easy to portray the battle for Kamchatka as a struggle
between those who wish to preserve the earth and those who would
plunder it.  But the people here have a reverence for their surroundings
and a strong desire to protect them.  They also have bleak prospects
for the future.  

     Moscow can no longer afford to support places like Kamchatka;
that much is clear.  If it survives, it will have to find a way
to do it alone.  

     ''We are forgotten by the federal Government,'' said Gennadi
Devyatkin, head of the local administration in the gold-producing
region in central Kamchatka that includes Esso.  ''Forgotten
except when they want our fish.  We are a colony and Moscow can
only take from us.  At least in the old days they would give us
back enough to survive.  Not anymore, though.'' 

     That is why it is no longer possible to ignore the most obvious
source of wealth in Kamchatka.  There are from 500 to 1,000
tons of gold here, a figure that, while not enormous by world
standards, could bring in as much as $10 billion.  

     ''It's not going to change the world gold market,'' said Samuel
Romberger, professor of Economic Geology at the Colorado School
of Mines.  ''But it might excite a bunch of Western adventurists.''

     That's for sure.  Canadian, American and Russian companies have
all been eager to get digging and the fight has already become
messy.  Many of those who want the region to grow, or at least
to continue supporting humans, say tourism is the only way to
do it.  

     Since the peninsula has 30 active volcanoes and more than
100 that are dormant, one of the world's great geyser fields (along
with Yellowstone), tens of thousands of rivers and lakes, and
every type of animal from sea otter and sable to the world's biggest
eagles, tourism seems to make a lot of sense.  

    But with no roads, the only way to move about the peninsula
is by helicopter.  And most helicopters are controlled by one company.
Visiting the Valley of the Geysers--where more than 200 geysers
spout, bubble and boil into the sky--can cost $2,000 for a few
hours.  A round-trip plane ticket from Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky
to Palana, the northern administrative center, is $400.  Many families
don't earn that in a year.  

     ''You would need to spend millions of dollars to turn this
into a tourist attraction that would bring more than just the
most adventurous travelers,'' said Gennadi M.  Karpov, deputy director
of the Institute of Vulcanology, the premier scholarly institution
in Kamchatka.  ''The two volcano ranges are wonders of the
world.  But if you don't have several thousand dollars you can
only see them from far away.  You are not going to get thousands
of tourists if all we have to offer them are helicopter rides.''

     There are few hotels outside the capital, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky,
partly because the peninsula is in the center of a major earthquake
zone and the cost of building hotels that can withstand earthquakes
is huge.  

     Fishing is the only industry here to prosper.  But many people
feel its singular success may doom it.  More than a million tons
were hauled from the seas near Kamchatka in 1996--a record
catch and one that specialists here feel is too large even for
such rich waters.  This year the Russian Government permitted quotas
that are even higher, though, because with little else in the
way of income fishing is all most people have.  That is why so
many residents have reluctantly turned their hope to mining.
 
Near Future or Far, Jobs Are Crucial 

     The effects of mining are difficult to predict.  New techniques
reduce pollution immensely--but perhaps not enough to protect
Kamchatka.  Colorado still has many streams that are considered
toxic-waste sites more than 100 years after gold mining ended
in them.  It is not possible to extract gold from the earth without
flushing large amounts of heavy metals--which are always found
near gold deposits--into the surrounding water.  Fish eat them,
bears eat the fish--and both would suffer badly, as would people.

     ''The ground is wet here, and where it is not wet it is cold,''
said Igor Revenko, a leading bear biologist with the Kamchatka
Institute of Ecology.  Mr. Revenko has been taking a bear census
here for several years, attempting with many other experts from
around the world to understand why this appears to be the best
place on earth for them to live.  

    ''The conditions here are fragile and unique,'' he said.  ''This
is not Colorado where the ground was dry.  We are not nearly as
big as Alaska.  Also, we have to look at what we are going to get
if we ruin Kamchatka for a few tons of gold.'' 

     Mr. Revenko said the mines here would be exhausted within
30 years--a figure that regional mining supporters do not contest.
Then, if the natural splendors of the peninsula are affected--
and slight environmental challenges often have major adverse 
consequences--the possibility of using the place as an tourist 
spot may no longer exist.  

     ''Personally, over the long run,'' Mr. Revenko said, ''I think
there would be more money in tourism.'' 

     This year, in attempt to protect those areas of Kamchatka
that are truly wild and most in danger, Unesco put nearly 10 million
acres on its list of protected World Heritage Sites.  The legal
implications of that decision are not clear, but it has not made
everyone here happy.  

     ''Everyone has a plan to save Kamchatka,'' said Aleksandr
Rechednikov, a 50-year-old hunter in this town of 300 families.
''But they are not saving it for me.  I can't make a living hunting
anymore.  I can't fish.  There are no jobs to offer, none.  So why
don't the good rich people from everywhere else in the world leave
us alone and let us decide what to do in our own land?'' 

Facing Extinction, Tribes Hang On 

    Viktoriya Petrasheva also wishes people would leave the place
alone.  But her perspective couldn't differ more sharply from that
of Mr. Rechednikov.  Mrs. Petrasheva lives in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky
but she is one of the peninsula's dwindling number of indigenous
people--a member of the Itelmen tribe, which began its first wave 
of eastward migration more than 10,000 years ago.  There were
25,000 Itelmen in Kamchatka when the Russians came in 1697.
Today there are 1,000 to 2,000.  

     ''My grandfather was executed in 1934,'' she said.  ''He was
accused of being a spy for Japan.  My mother was 6.  Her mother
was labeled an ''enemy of the people''--Stalin's infamous term
for millions who then endured suffering, and usually death.  ''But
ever since the Russians came here we have been enemies of the
people.  So it was nothing new.'' 

     Mrs. Petrasheva is an ethnographer who has studied the fate
of natives in Kamchatka--most of whom still live in the
north, coastal or central parts of the peninsula.  Her results
are not encouraging.  For centuries the Even, Koryak and Itelmen
lived easily in harsh conditions.  They herded reindeer, which
provided meat and skins, caught and preserved an endless supply
of salmon and hunted the bears, foxes and sable, whose furs helped
them to survive the cold.  

     Taking a notebook from the shelf, she provided an account
of deaths in the native Even village of Anavgai, just 25 miles
from Esso.  In 1994, 8 people died there--out of 300--and nobody
was born.  She reels off the ages of the dead: 25, 27, 38, 41.
In all, 26 villagers have died there in the last three years--
with two births.  There have been one murder and seven suicides.
The reindeer population--which sustained the village--has
slid from 19,000 to less than 2,500 in the last decade.  

     ''You can't even hope that we will survive as a nation,''
said Katya Atelkut, a veterinarian, sitting in the cultural center
of Anavgai.  Although it is May, all around her snow covers the
hills and mountains.  

     ''Maybe we won't even survive at all,'' she said.  ''People
leave if they can.  They drink if they can't leave.  And now there
is going to be gold.  I don't know why, but somehow it is hard
for me to believe we will see very much of it.  I don't want to
see them dig up the earth.  Its all we have here now, and when
that is gone there will be nothing left.'' 
tophome
Copyright (1997) The New York Times Company.  Reprinted by 
Permission. New York Times material may not be used in any 
manner except for personal reference without the written 
permission of The New York Times Company.